Sertorius
05-05-2009, 06:11 PM
I'm loving the game, thanks to Adam and the team for their great work.
When running a fed that uses a cage, I've found that the judging seems to overvalue wrestling, in my opinion. In particular, just holding an opponent against the cage for a minute seems to score pretty significant points, even where no real offence is attempted. I see rounds where a fighter is knocked down twice and loses the striking definitively, but wins the round by holding the opponent against the cage for a couple of minutes despite doing no damage. As best I can tell, the judges give more credit for this than for being in top position on the ground while attempting little offence.
I do think such a fighter deserves some credit for controlling the action, but my perception is that it's slightly out of balance in the game. Do others agree, or is it just me?
When running a fed that uses a cage, I've found that the judging seems to overvalue wrestling, in my opinion. In particular, just holding an opponent against the cage for a minute seems to score pretty significant points, even where no real offence is attempted. I see rounds where a fighter is knocked down twice and loses the striking definitively, but wins the round by holding the opponent against the cage for a couple of minutes despite doing no damage. As best I can tell, the judges give more credit for this than for being in top position on the ground while attempting little offence.
I do think such a fighter deserves some credit for controlling the action, but my perception is that it's slightly out of balance in the game. Do others agree, or is it just me?