Split Decisions

[JoshEngleman]

I was wondering if it was possible to have split decisions announced without giving away the winner before the 3rd judge.

I just had a fight where the first two judges had fighter A and judge 3 had it fighter B. It seems like it would add a bit more intrigue if they were listed in a different order. Obviously, this is just cosmetic, but I think it would be more in line with real life.

[Sons of Kohral]

I've had it where it went back and forth, Judge 1 for fighter A, Judge 2 for fighter B and Judge 3 for Fighter A.

[Carparama]

That's not the issue. The issue, is re-arranging the judge's scoring, during split decisions. I actually think this is a decent idea, as long as "A - B - A" and "B - A - A" would be possible, and not just always "A - B - A". In other words, that it wouldn't always be what the first judge says.

Good idea, sir. I approve.