Grey Dog Software

Go Back   Grey Dog Software > Total Extreme Wrestling 2016 > Total Extreme Wrestling 2016 Suggestions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 12-04-2017, 04:40 PM
Hive's Avatar
Hive Hive is offline
All Star
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,133
Default Time decline penalizing double

When a worker hits time decline, his stats starts declining - resulting in poorer matches. That's fine. But then on top of that, there's an extra penalty for "physical decline". That extra penalty seems off to me, since it's punishing us twice for the same thing. It's sort of happy hour for punishment. Only it isn't happy at all. It's annoying.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 12-07-2017, 08:51 AM
FankuKaibutsu FankuKaibutsu is offline
Low Minors
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 201
Default

Agreed. I've seen workers go from B+ performances to C- performances after only a couple months of time decline kicking in and only a slight decrease in their stats.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 12-07-2017, 10:15 AM
SirMichaelJordan SirMichaelJordan is offline
Phenom
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 640
Default

I feel like physical decline would keep older guys away from high intensity companies while time decline would keep guys from still being A level workers at a safe haven wrestling company with low intensity.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread 12-08-2017, 12:26 AM
marsupial311 marsupial311 is offline
Low Minors
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 247
Default

I believe time decline and physical decline are two separate things. While generally, they happen at the same time, it's not always the case.

Time decline is the actual stats going down due to age. Physical decline is based on the "physical" tab on the worker's profile.

Example: A guy who is 33 and wrestled in a huge company for 10+ years. All those matches probably have an effect on him and he might be in physical decline but in terms of his ratings, he's likely in his prime. The opposite would be a special attraction guy like Lesnar who at 40 is probably at or near time decline (a step slower in the ring, etc.) but physically doesn't have the wear and tear on him that would put him in physical decline.

I might be wrong though. I've definitely got the "physical decline" match penalty from guys who are not losing skills though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Array [all_times_are_gmt_x_time_now_is_y]


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.