|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1231
|
||||
|
||||
|
/nod
![]() |
|
#1232
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#1233
|
||||
|
||||
|
In front of me are 18 cups of wine, each with a different player's name on them... and they are all MINE!! You can't have any, so you'll have to kill me if you want one!!
![]() |
|
#1234
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sadly for you, I am immune to iocane powder.
|
|
#1235
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmm... how many fingers do you have on your left hand? And while you're answering questions, you want to tell us how we go about lynching you? All 18 votes on you just isn't cool, but I'm sure there has to be a way to lynch you cos the town can't just be relying on night kills to off you.
|
|
#1236
|
||||
|
||||
|
And I targeted DJ on night 4.
|
|
#1237
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#1238
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
change Vote:No Lynch Yes, while that is shocking for me to suggest a no lynch right now numbers can play a crucial part over the next couple of days and we need everyone we can good or bad and don't want to risk killing a townie in an attempt to get more information. I think the risk versus reward is recognizable right now on this and we should be able to gather enough Intel from tonight to figure out what to do in the next day phase. Also notice that I think every time SF has been voted on there isn't a full amount on him before he puts his name. What if his lynch vulnerability is that he can't be lynched as long as he puts a vote on himself before 70% of people put there vote down or something weird like that. Some way he can block his own lynch if he votes on himself first. |
|
#1239
|
||||
|
||||
|
Clearly DJ is one sexy talking duck.
A duck ahead of his time. We're only now realizing the full extent of his sexiness. |
|
#1240
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() I don't know why it's so hard to believe that I'm just legitimately barely hanging on here... ![]() If it matters to anyone, my gem is green. |
|
#1241
|
||||
|
||||
|
So is Destiny's.
I suppose bringing dead tech to life is the same as bringing dead organics to life... /ponders |
|
#1242
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() But seriously, I know this could just be a semantics vs game mechanics thing so it's probably a null point, but the idea feels weird to me that a gem makes tech work. I just can't see a "Science Gem" being something that would exist and that's how it's sitting in my head. |
|
#1243
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm starting to feel like I'm the only person here who doesn't have a gem.
|
|
#1244
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe not the only one but it is starting to feel like the gemless are a minority rather than the norm. Which concerns me a bit...
|
|
#1245
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|