|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5551
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not 100% sure of what went on witht he conference call that was so upsetting, but if MMA is trying to minimize a PED abuser, it would sound like any real sport to me.
|
|
#5552
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just pump Hector Oscar Molina M.D into google... Then listen to his testimony. Around the time you get from the botched plastic surgery and over to his domestic violence charge I think you'll get it.
|
|
#5553
|
||||
|
||||
|
Whilst in general i agree with this, however Overeem got off extremely lightly.. The fact that he tried to "get out of town" as soon as the press conference was finished so he could avoid the random testing tells it's own story!
|
|
#5554
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
NSAC: Right Mr Overeem, last time we asked you to take a drug test you skipped the country. You gave us a reason, but we never actually checked it out, despite it taking only a single phone call to verify. Anyway, because it was a little dodgy, we'll grant you a special licence for one fight. Overeem: Thanks! NSAC: But as part of the licence, you have to pass two surprise drug tests. ***Three months later*** NSAC: You failed the first surprise test spectacularly. Not only that, but when you were told about it you ran out of the building! Overeem: I was trying to avoid being served court papers in public. NSAC: Hmm. It's public knowledge that you were served before the press conference got under way. Those papers would be time-stamped, so we could prove that you're lying quite easily....nah, we'll just take your word for it. Overeem: Thanks! NSAC: Anyway, despite clearly breaking our rules and agreeing that it's your responsibility...oh, and bringing along Dr Nick from The Simpsons to defend you...we'll reduce the amount of time you have to sit out by three months. See you in December and chin up! This is who is regulating our sport. Idiots. |
|
#5555
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5556
|
|||
|
|||
|
You're wrong. They wouldn't have bothered to randomly test Overeem in the first place.
|
|
#5557
|
||||
|
||||
|
BH I did legit lol after reading some more into it then looking at your interpretation of the events. Dr. Nick lol.
Anyway. I know most of us want a clean pure sport. In my humble opinion, you can't ask a governing body of a sport to police itself. MMA commissions make money from MMA. Overeem draws money. This may be a narrow minded view of how the sport works on that level, but it's no different in any other sport from my point of view. Vince McMahon didn't give a crap about drug usage in his company until it started costing him money. I DESPISE government involvement and lawsuits in general, but maybe some people need to get sued or something. Maybe its the only way to make things right? In other news, this: http://www.mmaweekly.com/ufc-respond...f-social-media I HATE HATE HATE the idea of a friggin mixed martial artist having to go to sensitivity training. He literally hurts people for a living. What on earth could a twitter follower of a UFC fighter honestly expect? It's the fighters' faults that their fanbase is too stupid to read and interpret what should be taken seriously and what shouldn't? Look, if a political leader was dropping rape jokes, I'd understand an uproar. But an MMA fighter?? Really? Sensitivity training? Should we teach them hwo to sensitively punch their opponents in their heads until they are unconscious? I wish UFC showed a bit more balls and were willing to separate themselves as a company from the talent they've paid to entertain their fans. I know they lost some money from the Bud sponsorship, but I wish more people would take a stand against this. If you are a free speech advocate you should be seriously concerned with stuff like this. We used to fear the infringement of free speech from the government. But now that corporations do it, we seem to all be ok with it. Last edited by bigtplaystew : 04-26-2012 at 09:33 PM. |
|
#5558
|
|||
|
|||
|
The only reason why they have sensitivity training is because they want to show they as a promotion is taking "action", but in reality, is shifting responsibility from themselves onto the fighters. People were recommending they have a policy or guidelines onto use to social media.
Besides, it is not illegal... hell, it is LEGAL for corporations to censor their own employees. It "permits" (hah!) control of possible breaches of internal information, and to "regulate" (hah!) their employees from improper speech under the corporation capacity. That's more or less of it. And this is coming from a guy that thinks the UFC is far from the worst corporation in the world. |
|
#5559
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thing is, how far is enough? If someone uses a rape joke on a fox card, then the UFC would be paying for it a lot. People try and find a way to make MMA look bad, and UFC doesn't want to hand them a golden platter.
On note of sponser pulling out, I think it's plain stupid. I'd someone is watching a fight, they are more likly to grab a bud light because of the huge logo in the center or the commercial, heck even the bikinis during UFC 132. |
|
#5560
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is the real world - if fighters want to tweet rape jokes, I'm sure they're more than welcome to while fighting infront of 200 people at a nightclub MMA event. If they want to fight on Fox infront of millions, be in videogames etc, then they can behave. |
|
#5561
|
||||
|
||||
|
Though I agree with that, I also think people need to grow some backbone. Some people use the slightest excuse to talk about racism or violence. Maybe they need to use the money to train people into acknowledging these messages for what they are: jokes.
If they would direct a message like that to me personally, and it vaguely looks like they mean it (something like "i'm gonna get you, you little sh*t!" ), and I have in no way done anything to induce this, thčn I would probably be offended. But I don't see that happening. If it does, the fighter in question should indeed receive some training, not towards 'net etiquette', but towards moral values/behaviour in general. |
|
#5562
|
||||
|
||||
|
If anyone follows me on Twitter they might of already seen this...but for those who don't (and why don't you?) then I have a bit of news....
I've just been appointed match maker for Colosseum Sports, the brand behind CSMMA here in the UK. So basically I will now be playing WMMA3, but FOR REAL. I'm coming for you Joe Silva, I'm coming for you.... |
|
#5563
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just out of curiosity, is that Colosseum Sports in any way related to the company that does \ did the Colosseum Sports Home Videos for the WWF many years back?
__________________
Adam Ryland Designer of TEW, WMMA, WreSpi, and Comic Book Hero To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
#5564
|
||||
|
||||
|
I saw it on twitter during one of my rare visits. Congrats.
Hmm, given you have a big budget, it shouldn't be too hard. I'd shortlist the big fighters like Silva, GSP and Jones, so you know when their contract runs out. If WMMA taught me anything, it's that you can get anyone as long as you get the money. ![]() j/k. Have fun with it! On a sidenote. Some women of no little fame will fight tomorrow on the Invicta Fighting Championship. It's supposed to be streamed live for free. As some of those women are reasonably well known (Coenen, Carmoushe, Young, D'Alelio, olympian Randy Miller, video game-featured Gutierrez, ...) I suppose their skill level is fair enough so it's watchable. Apart from the "Supa Fight.... Lčague" recently, I know of little 'significant' cards that are streamed live (if you want to call the women's matches significant of course; I know I do). Last edited by Blackman : 04-27-2012 at 12:41 PM. |
|
#5565
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ahh, that takes me back! And no, I don't think so. Colosseum Sports is a fairly new entity...this May show will be only their third, and they've only been managing fighters for a couple of years.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|